Template:Did you know nominations/1977 Aeroflot Tupolev Tu-134 hijacking


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

1977 Aeroflot Tupolev Tu-134 hijacking

 * ... that in 1977, hostages on board a hijacked airliner were able to escape when their captors fell asleep?  , in Swedish, use Google Translate
 * ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kyrö Distillery Company

Created by The ed17 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg I love this hook! Definitely made me read the article for sure. I'd split the paragraph in the "Incident" section though to two, which would make it easier to read; otherwise, I don't see any other issues with the article that would prevent it from going to DYK. -- Sky Harbor ( talk ) 04:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Note: The QPQ has not yet been done. Yoninah (talk) 00:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * My apologies, . I was aware that the QPQ criteria wasn't met, but everything else was when I reviewed the article and I had neglected to put that in my review. In either instance, I'd think that once the QPQ criteria is met, the review stands regardless. -- Sky Harbor ( talk ) 02:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * "Explicit" means spell out the criteria you reviewed. Many reviewers have a standard line that they write. Mine is: "New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook ref verified and cited inline. QPQ done." Yoninah (talk) 14:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * QPQ done. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)