Template:Did you know nominations/1994 Imam Reza shrine bomb explosion


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

1994 Imam Reza shrine bomb explosion

 * ... that the 1994 bomb explosion in Imam Reza Shrine in Mashhad left at least 25 dead and 70-300 injured? Source 1, Source 2
 * Reviewed: Ralph Jean-Louis

Created by Mhhossein (talk). Self-nominated at 12:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC).


 * Your QPQ review does not mention a copyvio check . P p p er y 14:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The nominator has now added a copyvio check to his review, which makes it complete. P p p er y 13:25, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Pppery: Sorry, but your comment is basically nonsense. The review was already complete before your baseless intervention. -- M h hossein   talk 15:44, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg : We need a reviewer after that intervention. -- M h hossein   talk 09:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Long enough, new enough, many refs. Seems balanced. Earwig says "5.7% - violation unlikely. Hook mostly checks out, except that the source for "300" actually says "nearly 300". The article infobox is problemmatic - are we sufficiently sure that MEK organized it?  Why are the injured in an "inquiries" field?  Johnbod (talk) 02:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. I added the word "nearly" for more accuracy, however it makes no problem for the hook as we don't know whether it was really higher or less than 300. Just one of the sources names another organization, i.e. a Pakistani militant, should we name it in the infobox besides MEK? Btw, I corrected the problem with causalities in the infobox.  M h hossein   talk 06:15, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Ok thanks, points resolved. GTG. Johnbod (talk) 16:52, 24 October 2016 (UTC)