Template:Did you know nominations/2005 FA Community Shield


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:20, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

2005 FA Community Shield

 * ... that the predominant nationality of the players at the 2005 FA Community Shield was French?
 * ALT1:... that after Arsenal F.C.'s defeat in the 2005 FA Community Shield, Arsene Wenger said that "no-one regards it as a trophy so I do not mind any more"?

Improved to Good Article status by Lemonade51 (talk). Nominated by Matty.007 (talk) at 14:26, 5 July 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Recently became a GA and it is a "readable prose size". ALT1 is much more better. The only thing is needed a QPQ. FairyTailRocks 21:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment regarding the article text for ALT1 "The defeat for Arsenal somewhat assured Wenger "[It] is not too important... " - not sure assured is the right word here. starship.paint   "YES!" 13:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Changed. No QPQ needed as not a self nom. Thanks, Mat  ty  .  007  13:51, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * This review is incomplete, and needs to address the actual criteria: that the hook is supported both in the article and in the sourcing, and that the source citations are made by the end of the sentence in which the information occurs, and that the article is neutral, each paragraph is sourced, and there is no close paraphrasing or similar issues. DYK reviews are independent of GA reviews, so the latter cannot be reused in the former. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:53, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol question.svg Here is my full review:
 * The article is in its "readable prose size" with 9,116 characters.
 * It was promoted GA in July 4 and nominated in July 5
 * Ref no. 20 and 12 are dead.
 * Where is the reference in the original hook? ALT1 is supported by ref no. 32.
 * No disambig links found
 * Overall, the article is neutral and full of references. (I assume good faith that some references like the Daily Mail and offline sources are reliable) The only thing to be resolved are the dead links and my question about the original hook. FairyTailRocks 20:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, original hook was error. Fixed 404. Thanks, Mat  ty  .  007  11:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Ref #12's archive URL isn't working directly, but imputting the web address at and clicking Google Cache is working for me. Perhpas remove the URL and say it's offline (which it is now)? Thanks,  Mat  ty  .  007  11:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg Hey sorry for the late reply. To ensure its verification, online sources are much better than offline. You could use Google Cache for this, only if there is no archived material in the Wayback Machine or any archive-related website. All in all, I believe it should be ready in the Main page!
 * When I go to the Google Cache it works, but linking it only gets a 404. Thanks for the review, Mat  ty  .  007  07:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)