Template:Did you know nominations/2016 OFC Nations Cup Final


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 OFC Nations Cup Final

 * ... that one of the 2016 OFC Nations Cup finalists had never got out of the competition's group stage before 2016?


 * ALT1:... that the 2016 OFC Nations Cup Final was the first to go to penalties?

5x expanded by Yellow Dingo (talk). Self-nominated at 09:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC).




 * Symbol question.svg Some issues found.
 * &#x2713; This article has been expanded from 221 chars to 2824 chars since 09:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC), a 12.78-fold expansion
 * &#x2713; This article meets the DYK criteria at 2824 characters
 * &#x2713; All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
 * &#x2717; This article has the following issues:
 * from June 11, 2016 Thought I had fixed this...  Intelligent  sium  03:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * &#x2713; The probability of copyright violation is 3.8%. (confirm)
 * Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 115 characters
 * &#x2713; This is Yellow Dingo's' 2nd nomination. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 3 more DYKs.


 * Doing the proper (human) review now, as the bot review is currently experimental.
 * ✅ Expanded enough (224 characters here, now 2913 characters), nominated in time (expansion started 18 June, nominated on 23 June), long enough (over 1500 characters), and within policy.
 * ✅ Hook is short enough, interesting and both hooks are supported by the list of finals at . I would be happy with either hook, small preference for ALT1, as I prefer shorter hooks.
 * ✅ QPQ exempt, as 2nd nomination (per ).
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)