Template:Did you know nominations/2018–19 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:41, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

2018–19 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team

 * ... that the 2018–19 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team features an incoming class with two players that finished in the top three voting for the 2018 Mr. Basketball of Michigan award?

Created by DetroitFan7 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC).


 * ALT1 ... that the 2018–19 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team is expected to be the number 4 ranked team in the preseason Coaches and AP Polls according to Sports Illustrated and is expected to be unranked by NBC Sports?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:50, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * ALT2 ... that the 2018–19 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team is coming off of the winningest season in school history?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:50, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

N.B.: This article was co-edited by User:TonyTheTiger.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)


 * This is my first review, so my apologies if I screw something up.
 * Article
 * Article was created on April 3rd, nominated on April 9th.
 * At time of review, article has 6637 characters of prose.
 * Article is well-referenced, neutral. I was a little concerned about WP:CRYSTALBALL, but the article does a good job of only summarizing what has been put out by the media. Earwig tool pointed out a couple of sentences that were copied word-for-word from a CBS article. I paraphrased the info.
 * Hook
 * 187 characters, 217 characters, 116 characters. Formatting seems OK. First two hooks have inline citations, but I wasn't able to find one for the third hook.
 * The original hook is ok. ALT1 is kind of a mouthful, and ALT2 is missing an inline reference. I'm not a big basketball fan, so none of these were super interesting to me.
 * QPQ
 * I'm not sure how to verify this, to be honest.
 * No image, no issue.
 * Symbol confirmed.svg - use original hook. Please let me know if I have royally screwed up this review. -- kewlgrapes (talk, contribs) 07:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)