Template:Did you know nominations/A Hill to Die Upon


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:56, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

A Hill to Die Upon

 * ... that in 2004, two Cooks created A Hill to Die Upon?


 * Comment: I will use this as the first one of my five, where it does not need a QPQ, since, now I am co-nominating the article, with 3family6.The Cross Bearer (talk) 06:47, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Created by 3family6 (talk) and The Cross Bearer (talk). Nominated by 3family6 (talk) at 02:47, 3 July 2015 (UTC) and co-nominated by The Cross Bearer (talk) 06:47, 6 July 2015 (UTC).


 * Reviewed: 1944 Michigan Wolverines football team


 * Support: This is a fine article, per co-nom.The Cross Bearer (talk) 06:47, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I will do the QPQ on this one for 3family6.The Cross Bearer (talk) 09:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg But has more than 5 DYKs, so he should submit a QPQ. Yoninah (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I was originally going to do a QPQ, but The Cross Bearer came in and claimed this as their nomination. I wasn't sure how to proceed, so I let things stand. I'm happy to do a QPQ, if needed, or else remove myself as a nominator.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 21:54, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, I've never seen two nominators on a DYK hook. If you want to get a nomination credit, please submit a QPQ. If not, go ahead and remove yourself from the credits. Best, Yoninah (talk) 21:57, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Yoninah, since 3family6 did the initial nomination, it's his nomination and his responsibility. That's how DYK works. I can understand that The Cross Bearer might want to take a more active role in supporting the nomination, but as nominator it is 3family6's ultimate responsibility to supply the QPQ. (There can be no freebie here.) The Cross Bearer's "co-nomination" was after the seven-day newness period expired, so it can't stand as a sole nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank, you,, for straightening that out. I'll work on a QPQ.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 00:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry to I was going to create their article alone by myself, before I saw 3family6 was working on it in his sandbox, where I had some of the research done to show notability for the band, in order to get their article to mainspace. You did a fantastic job, with regards to the article, 3family6.The Cross Bearer (talk) 02:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * ALT2: ... that in 2004, two Cook brothers created A Hill to Die Upon?
 * Two cooks, means profession, where it should read "two Cook brothers". I will pass this article, when agrees to this change. I am sorry for such a minor discrepancy.The Cross Bearer (talk) 09:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * - One of the points of DYK is to create a hook that is "catchy." In this case, I intentionally wrote the hook to be a pun.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 14:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The Cross Bearer, as one of the main editors of the article, you are not eligible to review ("pass") the nomination. That will be up to an independent reviewer, who will be requested once the QPQ has been completed. As an aside, I rather like the pun, and "two Cooks" (two people named Cook) is technically accurate, but we can see what the reviewer thinks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I would like to thank you for the advice, with regards to this matter. This is one fine article, where I hope it gets to be on DYK sooner rather than later.The Cross Bearer (talk) 02:22, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 * QPQ done, awaiting a review.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 14:46, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Long enough, new enough, neutral, copyvio-free, ALT0 short enough and sourced. Good to go.-- Laun  chba  ller  19:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)