Template:Did you know nominations/Aartswoud


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Aartswoud

 * ... that around the Dutch village of Aartswoud, the former polder landscape and its seasonal water levels are being restored? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Gilmore Oil Company. Drmies (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm tagging Eric for his extraordinary editing. I'm not totally happy with the hook but the clock is ticking


 * ALT2: ... that the area occupied by the present-day Dutch village of Aartswoud, an important source for the Beaker culture, has been inhabited since the late Neolithic age? Eric   Corbett  15:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

5x expanded by Drmies (talk) and Eric Corbett (talk). Nominated by Drmies (talk) at 15:31, 28 April 2018 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Interesting details, substantial expansion on fine sources, no copyvio obvious. The original hook has no ref right behind the sentence. The ALT1 is fine, but something not unique to this place, or is it? How about using the image, for something else? Please try to close each para with a ref, - for looking complete ;) - waiting for qpq also. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You'll have a long wait if you're waiting for qpq from me, so I hope you've got a nice easy-chair to relax in. Eric   Corbett  09:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The art of waiting is to do something else in between. - I have to say something about copyvio and qpq, or someone will tell me the review is not complete. I believe Drmies will do a review, while you host a funny thread on your talk ;) - I am all for infoboxes, but have not tried to force one into an article, ever, and as if such a thing were even possible. I have told people to stay away from infobox discussions, and that request has been named "inflammatory", and it gets even worse when I call anything funny, and myself amused ;) - allegedly, I drove editors away by saying so. Relaxed --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:09, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll take care of this tomorrow, Gerda--thanks. Eric, you've done enough work already. Have a beer on me. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Gerda Arendt, there was one paragraph that didn't end with a reference, now added--that sentence about the rectory. The other one you may point at is the introduction to those nature reserves ("... are governed by Landschap Noord-Holland"); that they are governed by that organization is verified in each of the individual sections, and I could ref-bomb the sentence by linking to three separate web pages but that seems like overkill to me. Drmies (talk) 14:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * OK I found a brochure that lists them. Also helpful for the tourist. ;) Drmies (talk) 14:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Good ;) - ready to approve once the qpq is done --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Gerda Arendt, it's done--actually you got two for the price of one. Drmies (talk) 14:53, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg offline sources accepted AGF. Thanks, both. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)