Template:Did you know nominations/Acer browni, Acer nipponicum

Nomination withdrawn by submitter

Acer browni, Acer nipponicum

 * ... that the extinct, Miocene age, maple Acer browni is closely related to the living Acer nipponicum?
 * Reviewed: Jasus caveorum

Created/expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self nom at 22:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * It is not clear to me that the hook is in ref 1. Date and length are fine and the hook will be O.K. once I can verify it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * See page 76 of Wolfe and Tanai in the discussion section of A. smileyi. If concerning, the word closely could be removed from the hook.-- Kev min  § 01:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 * There is already an approved nomination on this page for Acer browni (see Template:Did you know nominations/Acer browni), nominated by the same user on December 11, two days before this one. I'm not sure of the rules, but it seems odd that the same article could be featured twice. Isn't there a prohibition against doing so? If there is, this might be an easy fix: both pages could be mentioned, but Acer browni unbolded. (Whether the hook should be inverted to put the bolded Acer nipponicum is another question.) Note: I'm new enough that I might not be understanding the rules correctly or the ease of any fix, but thought I should mention this now rather than later. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg Withdraw the nomination! I don't know how I missed this, but in creating the nomination I linked to the incorrect new article!  I will recreate the nom with the correct extinct maple species (Acer smileyi).-- Kev  min  § 20:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Are you withdrawing this nomination or that one?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:26, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * This one has been withdrawn.-- Kev min  § 20:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)