Template:Did you know nominations/Acropora abrolhosensis


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Keilana&#124;Parlez ici 18:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

====Acropora abrolhosensis, Acropora anthocercis, Acropora awi, Acropora batunai, Acropora caroliniana, Acropora dendrum, Acropora derawanensis, Acropora desalwii, Acropora donei, Acropora echinata, Acropora elegans, Acropora hemprichii, Acropora hoeksemai, Acropora horrida, Acropora indonesia, Acropora kimbeensis, Acropora kirstyae, Acropora kosurini, Acropora loisetteae, Acropora lokani, Acropora microclados, Acropora multiacuta, Acropora paniculata, Acropora papillare, Acropora pharaonis, Acropora plumosa, Acropora polystoma====


 * ... that acroporid coral species Acropora abrolhosensis, A. anthocercis, A. awi, A. batunai, A. caroliniana, A. dendrum, A. derawanensis, A. desalwii, A. donei, A. echinata, A. elegans, A. hemprichii, A. hoeksemai, A. horrida, A. indonesia, A. kimbeensis, A. kirstyae, A. kosurini, A. loisetteae, A. lokani, A. microclados, A. multiacuta, A. paniculata, A. papillare, A. pharaonis, A. plumosa, and A. polystoma are all classed as vulnerable?


 * Reviewed: Eastern Pilbara Craton (1), McCauley Mountain (Pennsylvania) (2), Nescopeck Mountain (3), Johan Hjalmar Théel (4), Elpidia glacialis (5), Sigma war games (6), Caribbean Legion (7), Project Hotfoot (8), Salvatore Stabile (9), HMS Alceste (1806) (10), Buck Mountain (Pennsylvania) (11), Kosuke Kato (12), Kickboxer (remake) (13), Christmas with Nashville (14), Metanephrocerus (15), Electra pilosa (16), List of centuries in Twenty20 International cricket (17), List of India Test cricketers who have taken five wickets on debut (18), Poulton Hall (19), Thorleiv Røhn (20), 2014 oil spill on Sundarbans (21) Vayilar (22), Sakkiya (23), Idangazhi (24), Anaya Nayanar (25), Kalikamba Nayanar (26), Satti Nayanar (27)
 * Comment: Rather than nominating these one-by-one (the hooks for which would be about as, or less interesting than this one), I have decided to nominate these articles as one hook to reduce the amount of nominations and potential hooks, and also to quickly use up a number of reviews that I would otherwise not use.

Created by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self-nominated at 19:24, 14 June 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg All articles are new enough (created on a range of dates from June 11 to June 13), long enough, and well sourced, including the hook source. Spot checking found no copied text (except from each other, but that's ok). Multiple QPQs all done. The overlong hook is justified by the many new articles listed. I fixed a minor formatting error in Acropora hoeksemai but otherwise didn't see any problems. Good to go. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg Because of the repetition of content between articles, most of these fall short of the 1500-character minimum. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:22, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look into the articles soon and try to expand some. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 22:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I've been looking into whether the articles could fall under WP:DYKSG, but am unsure about my understanding of that rule. Otherwise, which ones do you believe require expansion? Thine Antique Pen (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Over half of them are under 1500 characters once we exclude repeated text. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * , #A5 is supposed to refer to old text. If the text is 7 days old or less at the time of nomination, but repeated in multiple nominations, then the usual process has been to simply discount the repeated text rather than require it to be expanded x5. For example, if you have a nominated article that is 3000 characters long but half of that text is identical to text 7 days old or less in another article, then the nominated article is still eligible because the repeated 1500 characters is ignored and the article still has the minimum 1500 characters required. If the nominated article had 1500 chars of repeated text that was more than 7 days old, however, that text would need to be expanded x5 in the nominated article. Gatoclass (talk) 02:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. I'll take a look into them when I get some time, but that won't be for a week or so. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:39, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Would it be possible to cut this down to just the articles that are of the required length? Thine Antique Pen (talk) 11:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't see why not. Gatoclass (talk) 13:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I've done some expansions to Acropora abrolhosensis, Acropora awi, Acropora batunai, Acropora caroliniana, Acropora dendrum, Acropora derawanensis, Acropora desalwii, Acropora echinata, Acropora elegans, Acropora hemprichii, Acropora hoeksemai, Acropora indonesia, Acropora kimbeensis, Acropora kirstyae, Acropora kosurini, Acropora loisetteae, Acropora papillare, Acropora pharaonis, and Acropora polystoma, which had the smallest prose portions. Could you look over these and the other articles to see if they are now long enough? Thanks. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:52, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks like hoeksemai, lokani, pharaonis, and polystoma still need expansion. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I've done further expansions to the named articles, which I hope should be enough. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 22:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Need a bit more in hoeksemai and we should be good to go. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:12, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 08:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks good, thanks. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Now that articles have been expanded sufficiently, the twenty that were expanded should be rechecked to be sure they still meet the Within policy criteria and agree with the hook. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:17, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg There are no images. has checked lengths, enough cites, hook correct (and I have checked a lot but not all of them as they are nearly identical), neutral,  checked praraphrasing and age, all have sufficient refs. This is a great bit of work. I went on a search for images but sadly I couldn't find one although there are a few acropora pix on flickr with the right license. Thanks to all who have contributed to this series of articles .... especially  GTG  Victuallers (talk) 19:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Can we pause posting this as the describer of many of these corals Carden Wallace has no article. could you check help with article about her? Victuallers (talk) 20:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Checked quite a few more and these all look GTG Victuallers (talk) 11:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)