Template:Did you know nominations/Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl

Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
that the United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case on the Indian Child Welfare Act for only the second time in Supreme Court history? Created by GregJackP (talk). Self nom at 01:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment, the hook has to link to Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl somewhere. Perhaps "... that Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl is only the second case on the Indian Child Welfare Act taken on by the United States Supreme Court?" If any of my terminology is non-standard, feel free to improve. Chris857 (talk) 01:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment, my bad, sorry (I know better -facepalm- ). I like your hook, let's use it.   GregJackP   Boomer!   01:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

ALT1 ... that Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl is only the second case on the Indian Child Welfare Act taken on by the United States Supreme Court?"
 * I listed the current hook as Alt1 and struck the original hook.  GregJackP   Boomer!   20:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Needs full review. Chris857 (talk) 00:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg This article is new enough and long enough, the only problem is with the hook. I can see no mention in the article of this being the second ICWA case taken on by the Supreme Court. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:53, 16 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I've just put a notice on GregJackP's talk page. While the page says he's retired (posted February 6), he made a couple of edits today, so I think we should allow a full week from now for a response on the issue. Alternatively, someone here could try to address the "second ICWA case" issue in the article/sourcing, or propose a new hook that avoids the "second" part altogether. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:24, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * It sent me an email notice (I forgot to disable it) - my other edits were to an FA that was still in FAC when I retired. I added a sentence and ref to the U.S. Supreme Court subsection, last sentence.  Hopefully this will take care of it.   GregJackP   Boomer!   23:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg The hook is now supported by an inline citation and this nomination is ready to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)