Template:Did you know nominations/Alita: Battle Angel


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by North America1000 01:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Alita: Battle Angel

 * ... that Alita: Battle Angel has been repeatedly delayed by James Cameron's work on Avatar and it's sequels?


 * ALT1:... that James Cameron's Alita: Battle Angel has been repeatedly postponed as the director signs on to make more Avatar films?
 * ALT2:... that the title Alita: Battle Angel was chosen for James Cameron's adaptation of Battle Angel Alita "because Jim only does T&A movies"?
 * Reviewed: Edward Stevens (diplomat)
 * Comment: Note to reviewer: this article was originally expanded from a redirect on May 3.  then histemerged the article with the unrelated Draft:Alita: Battle Angel.  G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 13:45, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Converted from a redirect by G S Palmer (talk). Self-nominated at 13:45, 6 May 2016 (UTC).
 * The histmerge was done yesterday, so the timeline shouldn't affect the nomination. Eye close font awesome.svg czar  15:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I know, I was just worried that someone might look at the history, say "this goes back to last October!", and fail the nom. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I meant it for the same reasons ;) czar  16:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg This article is new enough and long enough. I have struck ALT2 because I am unconvinced with the T&A argument as being the reason for the projected film title. ALT0 and ALT1 are OK and have inline citations. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 21 May 2016 (UTC)