Template:Did you know nominations/American Party of South Carolina


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

American Party of South Carolina

 * ... that the American Party of South Carolina was founded in 2014 by Jim Rex?
 * ALT1 ... that every one of the American Party of South Carolina candidates in the 2014 election lost?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Harrild & Sons & Template:Did you know nominations/Josephine Butler bibliography
 * Comment:

Created by LavaBaron (talk). Self-nominated at 20:40, 7 August 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Date and length fine. However I have a few little niggles about the hook. The claim isn't cited inline and also it is a little dull given not many people know who Rex is (But this is a personal view based on precedents I have seen of people complaining but I will not stop promotion on that alone). QPQs done no close para. Just need those issues sorted then I can approve.  The C of E  God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 08:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I've sexed-up the hook The C of E. LavaBaron Promoters: Please ensure there are 2 reviews for this nomination (see my FAQ) 11:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg, I meant that I do not consider "dullness" as a reason for rejecting. Nevertheless the new hook is a bit more interesting and is cited inline. Without the original having the inline citation, I have to approve ALT1 only (though I would link which election you mean). Rest of the original review stands.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 08:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Second full review required per ANI decision. Struck original hook per The C of E. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg [2 of 2] This article is new enough and long enough. The hook fact is cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no policy issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Hook has been pulled from Prep. Source given in the article does not say they lost, but it's an assumption.. — Maile (talk) 12:27, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks - the article has been updated, as has the wikilink. Apologies for the inconvenience and oversight. LavaBaron (talk) 16:59, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your quick action. I believe your corrections satisfies the questions raised. I've returned it to Prep, this time in Prep 3  — Maile  (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2016 (UTC)