Template:Did you know nominations/Andrine Hegerberg

Andrine Hegerberg

 * ... that Norwegian international footballer Andrine Hegerberg made her professional debut at the age of 16?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Cologne sewerage system and Template:Did you know nominations/Chris Perez (second of two QPQ's)

Created by Hmlarson (talk). Self nominated at 04:39, 16 September 2013 (UTC). Ada Hegerberg was fivefold expanded by Mentoz86 (talk). Self nominated at Mentoz86 (talk) 22:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC).


 * I wasn't aware of this nomination, but I noticed the article earlier today, and I started expanding her sister's article Ada Hegerberg, in hopes that I would find an interesting fact that could make a dual-hook. Could this nomination be delayed for a couple of days, so that I can finish expand Ada's article? Mentoz86 (talk) 11:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I am fine waiting two days as long as it does not effect the original DYK nomination that was nominated on 9/15. Thanks for your work on Ada's article. Hmlarson (talk) 15:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Doesn't look like there has been any progress with the Ada Hegerberg article and I'd like to move forward with my original nomination. Any reviewers available to take a look? Hmlarson (talk) 21:37, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Need reviewer for this nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:02, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * ALT1 ... that the sisters Ada and Andrine Hegerberg scored one goal each when the Norwegian team won 2–1 against Canada in the 2012 FIFA U-20 Women's World Cup?
 * I'm done expanding Ada's article, and I believe this hook is interesting enough to make it a dual-hook nomination. I've also added a QPQ. While working on Ada's article, I found a couple of errors in Andrine's article, but I've tagged those and will try to fix them tomorrow. Mentoz86 (talk) 22:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Andrine article is new enough, long enough, well ref'd, no evidence of plagiarism or close paraphrasing (as far as I can tell, many refs being in Norwegian), original hook short enough, interesting enough and inline cited to a reliable source: good to go.Ada article is newly enough 5x expanded, long enough, well ref'd, no evidence of plagiarism or close paraphrasing (as far as I can tell, many refs being in Norwegian), ALT1 double hook short enough, interesting enough and inline cited to a reliable source in both articles. Two QPQs done.Only problem is that the Ada Hegerberg section is unsourced. When that's fixed, they're both good to go, assuming there isn't a time problem with how long the second article was added to the original nomination. If there is a time problem, then Andrine is good to go on its own with the original hook and Ada can follow when it's ready. Together would be better, though, in my opinion. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 18:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review, Struway. I've added two citations to that section and corrected the stats accordingly. Cheers, Mentoz86 (talk) 16:14, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Both good to go now. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)