Template:Did you know nominations/Anubrata Mandal


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  S ven M anguard   Wha?  17:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Anubrata Mandal

 * ... that during the panchayat elections of July 2013, Anubrata Mandal publicly encouraged Trinamool Congress supporters to hurl bombs at the police?
 * Reviewed: Pappa Umanath
 * Comment: moved to mainspace 4-30-14

Created by Jim Cartar (talk), Philg88 (talk), MelanieN (talk). Nominated by MelanieN (talk) at 18:49, 30 April 2014 (UTC).


 * Added and  to the credit list, they had made significant changes to the article.   J i m Carter  ( talk ) 03:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Though the article is new and long (2.155 KB); the reference says so; however, negative nature of the hook (NPOV) is worrying; especially in the Indian election season. Redtigerxyz  Talk 18:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * actually this person is famous for his negative behaviour. In this case NPOV cannot work because the hook is not said by us instead it was supported by a source. And he is not an election candidate for Lok Sabha general election of 2014, so nothing to worry about.   J i m Carter  ( talk ) 05:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg However, I will suggest that this article should not be featured on main page till 12 May, as Lok Sabha elections will go on in West Bengal till then. Mandal's party is contesting elections there. Redtigerxyz  Talk 13:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol question.svg Temporarily putting approval on hold until after the Lok Sabha elections are over, so the nomination isn't promoted prematurely. I'd also like to get a second opinion on the NPOV issue for after then. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg At first glance, I also thought the article was overly negative, but after reading numerous news headlines about him, it appears that this politician is famous for his controversial speech and behaviour. GTG now that the elections are over. -Zanhe (talk) 04:25, 13 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol question.svgSymbol redirect vote 4.svg Needs a full review, in accordance with. DYK review instructions please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed.  Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found  at  DYKReviewing guide.  — Maile  (talk) 21:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg The other aspects have already been reviewed by the first reviewer. But if you insist, here we go again: article is new enough, long enough, neutral, and thoroughly referenced to RS. Hook is interesting and verified. No copyvio detected (checked with Dup Detector). QPQ performed. Good to go. -Zanhe (talk) 04:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)