Template:Did you know nominations/Archie Amerson


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 02:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Archie Amerson

 * ... that Canadian football player Archie Amerson was described as both halves of the Hamilton Tiger-Cats' "one-two punch"? Source: "Past woes shouldn't be extra motivation"
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mason at Sight

Improved to Good Article status by BU Rob13 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:42, 7 January 2018 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg GA, in time, long enough, sourced, inline/offline hook citation accepted AGF, no apparent copyvios, QPQ done., any particular reason to have the attribution to the Spectator in the hook? Seems a bit punchier without it. --Usernameunique (talk) 06:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm fine taking it out. I usually try to attribute such "catchy" quotes to a particular paper to make it clear it isn't Wikipedia asserting the quote. ~ Rob 13 Talk 07:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg, removed the line and approving. I think it's fine, as it's both attributed and cited in the article, and the phrase "was described" makes it clear that it is not a claim that Wikipedia itself is asserting. --Usernameunique (talk) 07:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)