Template:Did you know nominations/Architecture of Turkey

Architecture of Turkey
Created/expanded by Mimar77 (talk). Nominated by Elekhh (talk) at 21:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ... that the Architecture of Turkey has been influenced by many architects from Germany and Austria invited between 1924 and 1942 to work in Ankara?



Everything checks out. Good to go. --İnfoCan (talk) 15:23, 31 January 2012 (UTC) --İnfoCan (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Underreferenced and with an expansion tag. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:29, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Each paragraph is referenced. The use of the refimprove tag without any more specific information was not helpful. If anybody contests the correctness of any information please provide specific inline Template:Citation needed tags, so that other editors get a clue of what is meant. I also removed the expansion tag which I agree that was ugly and fully unnecessary. Note that further references have been added since. Thanks. -- ELEKHHT 20:15, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * cn added. First one: The article says that the buildings are important, but no reference to support that judgment call. Second and third: Whole paragraphs without a reference. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Sentences are not paragraphs, and is less than constructive to bite a (qualified) newbie and questioning the obvious. This is the kind of attitude which discourages new editors. Assumption of good faith, friendly dialogue and guidance would be welcome. -- ELEKHHT 07:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The "sentences" are set as individual paragraphs (i.e. have spacing between them and the preceding paragraph). That they are not fully developed does not change the fact that they are still paragraphs. Regarding the other sentence, the issue is mainly the word "important"; that is a judgement call and as such should be supported by a reference. If Mimar (who has done good work thusfar) wants to remove "important" (i.e., only state that the buildings date from the period), I could accept the sentence without a reference. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the explanation, it makes much clearer where the objection was. I read the word "important" in the context as "notable examples", but removed it anyway as I don't think it changes the meaning. Further references have been added by Mimar77. -- ELEKHHT 11:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Thanks for the recent improvements. Article and hook length, sources and referencing satisfy requirements. Ready to go. --İnfoCan (talk) 17:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Concur on referencing. Tick based on previous review, AGF that all necessary checks have been carried out. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:03, 2 February 2012 (UTC)