Template:Did you know nominations/Aruneya Upanishad


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 21:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Aruneya Upanishad

 * ... that the Aruneya Upanishad says that an itinerant monk's (pictured) approach should be of truthfulness, chaste thinking, utterances and actions, and to not resort to any kind of violence or deceit?


 * Reviewed:Template:Did you know nominations/The Tribunal, Glastonbury
 * Comment: Moved from user page today

Created by Nvvchar (talk), Redtigerxyz (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 10:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC).


 * I like it, but the grammar is dubious. Article is long enough, and the History confirms that it was moved to the article space on the 17th. The cited text reads, "Chastity, non-violence, possessionlessness and truthfulness, you should observe this assiduously." That's much more clear and succinct than your hook. May I suggest something like,
 * ALT1 ... that the Aruneya Upanishad says that an itinerant monk's (pictured) approach should be one of chastity, nonviolence, truthfulness, and indifference to material possessions? --Rosekelleher (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestion. Redtigerxyz  Talk 17:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ALT1 hook is fine with us.-- Nvvchar . 07:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed now that hook is set; only newness and length have previously been checked. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg This article is new enough and long enough.The hook facts are well-sourced and have an inline citation. The article is neutral and I identified no policy issues. The image is in the public domain but is somewhat lacking in contrast. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)