Template:Did you know nominations/Baikuris


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Baikuris

 * ... that the fossil ant genus Baikuris (pictured) was first described from fossils in Cretaceous Russian amber?


 * ALT1:... that the fossil ant genus Baikuris (pictured) is known from adult males only?
 * Reviewed: Klipspringer
 * Comment: alt image File:Baikuris mandibularis PIN3730-5 whole.jpg

Created by Kevmin (talk) and Burklemore1 (talk). Nominated by Kevmin (talk) at 15:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC).


 * Article has not been created or expanded 5x or promoted to Good Article within the past 10 days. Otherwise, long enough (6,900 characters), fully referenced. Hook supported by online reference. Image appropriately licensed. ALT image may look better. QPQ done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The article was created in sandbox space, and not moved to article space until yesterday. Per DYK rules it is considered newly created.-- Kev  min  § 11:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg I missed that somehow. Good to go then. Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)