Template:Did you know nominations/Ballet Manila

Ballet Manila

 * ... that Ballet Manila received eight standing ovations in all of its eight performances in a 2011 tour of the United Kingdom and Ireland?


 * ALT 1:... that Ballet Manila received good raves and high praises in their performances of a recent 2011 United Kingdom and Ireland tour?


 * expanded 5x by 1143 Characters of prose to 7532 Characters of Prose by User:TitanOne (talk). Self nom at 15:56, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I prefer the main hook to the alternative hook. I don't think "good raves" makes sense – perhaps "good responses" or "rave reviews" should be used instead.
 * I think it is adequate to say "received standing ovations in all of its eight performances"; in other words, eight doesn't have to be repeated twice.


 * A number of portions of the text lack references:
 * "Repertoire": the last sentence of the first paragraph is not referenced.
 * "Facility": most of the information in this section is unreferenced.
 * "Advocacy": the 2010 interview with Macuja-Elizalde is unreferenced.
 * The reference in footnote 22 seems to be a partial reproduction of the reference in footnote 21. I think footnote 22 can be deleted.
 * Archive URLs should be added to avoid link rot. However, I don't think this affects whether the article should appear on DYK. — SMUconlaw (talk) 12:07, 11 October 2011 (UTC)