Template:Did you know nominations/Banat Republic


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Banat Republic

 * ... that the Banat Republic, proclaimed in 1918, sought to control "one of Europe's most complex areas"? Source: Kókai, p. 64
 * ALT1:... that days after the Banat Republic was proclaimed in 1918, the streets of its capital "trembled with the lockstep" of rival Romanian paramilitaries? Source: Dudaș & Grunețeanu, p. 141, quoting Commissioner Roth
 * ALT2:... that the Banat Republic of 1918 claimed it could raise 40,000 troops against the French Danube Army, but in reality had less than 4,000? Source: Kókai, p. 67, quoting Commissioner Bartha
 * Reviewed: Trump administration family separation policy

5x expanded by Dahn (talk). Self-nominated at 06:13, 1 July 2018 (UTC).


 * Question Does anyone know how to fix the ISBN templates in "References"? Dahn (talk) 13:50, 1 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment Flibirigit, we ran into an edit conflict. I was completing the review when you posted. Sorry about that!-- White Shadows Let’s Talk 21:36, 19 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I see that. I suggest placing the template on the review so that others won't try to review the same article. I will abandone the review I started. Flibirigit (talk) 21:39, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Very sorry Flibirigit. This has been my first DKY review in 6 years...will keep that in mind going forward. Thanks!-- White Shadows Let’s Talk 21:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note for White Shadows: I have corrected a few fields in the DYK checklist template, though the result is the same (AGF icon). Actual icons should not be used in the template, just "y", "n", "AGF", and so on, per the documentation (which tells you which values should be used with each parameter); if the template has been filled out correctly, it generates its own icon, and the bot checks that icon to see whether the nomination has been approved and therefore should be moved to the Approved page. Use of the template is optional; the review can be written as text without the checklist, in which case a single icon template (which should be used with "subst") summarizing the review should be included. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:54, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the helpful tip BlueMoonset!-- White Shadows Let’s Talk 03:56, 20 July 2018 (UTC)