Template:Did you know nominations/Bartlett and Robertson


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  Jolly  Ω   Janner  05:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Bartlett and Robertson

 * ... that the husband-and-wife piano duo of Bartlett and Robertson (pictured) were said to play like "four hands at a double keyboard controlled by a single mind"?


 * ALT1: ... that the husband-and-wife piano duo of Bartlett and Robertson commissioned two-piano music from Benjamin Britten, Sir Arnold Bax, Lennox Berkeley, and Bohuslav Martinů?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Liebster Jesu, mein Verlangen, BWV 32
 * Comment: Created for Women in Red – Women in Music virtual editathon

Created by Yoninah (talk). Self-nominated at 13:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC).


 * Comment Review under way. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 13:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Review Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go! New article, timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations.  It is devoid of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism.  DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough.  Every paragraph is cited. In passing, I note that I had only limited access to those that are "subscription required."  Earwig's copy violation detector: Bartlett and Robertson report gives it a clean bill. Both hooks are hooky enough, I think, and relate directly to the essence of the article.  They are interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. I prefer the original hook, although I think it should use "were" not "was."  QPQ done.  Beautiful article, meticulously cited.  Well done! 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 14:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Minor comment The original hook used "was" and refers to a duo. Should that be "were"? I think there is a disagreement between the plural subject "duo" and the singular verb "was".  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 14:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the great review and your work on the referencing. Yes, "were" sounds better; I changed it. Yoninah (talk) 14:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * A picture in the article and the nomination (we would have to insert one) would add greatly to its impact. Not required, of course. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎</b>) 14:52, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, here it is ... Yoninah (talk) 20:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Review Symbol confirmed.svg for revised ALT1</S> ALT0. <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 21:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you mean revised ALT0? Yoninah (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Dr. Blofeld has uploaded a clearer image (thanks, Doctor!). I've replaced it in this hook. Yoninah (talk) 11:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Image is free, used and clear at 100 pix. <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 12:02, 23 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Save for use on MainPage on Valentine's Day? --PFHLai (talk) 03:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * That's a nice idea, thanks! Yoninah (talk) 12:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)