Template:Did you know nominations/Battle for Outpost Vegas


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Battle for Outpost Vegas

 * ... that the Battle for Outpost Vegas and the surrounding outposts are considered the bloodiest fighting to date in western Korea during the Korean War?



Created/expanded by Jdanbeck (talk). Self-nominated at 20:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC).

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Solitaires Jdanbeck (talk) 21:04, 3 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol question.svg I don't see anything wrong with this (plagiarism, paraphrasing, etc.), but it would be good to mention more about the horse besides the one line in the intro, since this is a part of the hook and probably could be better-included in the article. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Nalty, Bernard C. (2003). Outpost War: United States Marines from the Nevada Battles to the Armistice. Washington DC: Department of the Navy. p. 27. ISBN 978-0160676321. Retrieved 3 April 2015. Jdanbeck (talk) 16:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Updated hook to reflect the article's concentration on the battle and not the horse. With that addition, is the DYK nom worthy of approval? Jdanbeck (talk) 06:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Is there a citation for that, as it only appears once and could be viewed as an opinion. Sorry to be that person on all of this, but I just want to make sure that no one will be able to challenge the fact down the road. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 14:18, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Updated the article, there is now a citation for the hook. Is the review good to go now? I appreciate your help.
 * Symbol confirmed.svg All issues have been addressed, good to go! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)