Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Gadara


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Battle of Gadara

 * ... that during the Battle of Gadara, a Nabataean force was victorious after it used a large number of camels in the form of a bulldozer to push the opposing Hasmoneans into a deep valley?


 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ajtony

Created by Makeandtoss (talk). Self-nominated at 14:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC).

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 22:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg No issues found with article, ready for human review.
 * &#x2713; This article is new and was created on 13:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * &#x2713; This article meets the DYK criteria at 3014 characters
 * &#x2713; All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
 * &#x2713; This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
 * &#x2713; A copyright violation is unlikely (0.0% confidence; confirm)
 * Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
 * No overall issues detected
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 180 characters
 * &#x2713; Makeandtoss has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Ajtony was performed for this nomination.
 * First time reviewing with the bot. The article is fine (as per bot). The hook is interesting and cited inline (AGF for offline source). QPQ has been completed. This is good to go! Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk 23:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)