Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Leuthen


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 01:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Article has previously appeared as a bold-linked article at On This Day, and is therefore unfortunately ineligible for DYK.

Battle of Leuthen

 * ... that after the the Battle of Leuthen, the victorious Frederick the Great stopped at the castle in Lissa to spend the night, and found it already occupied by Austrian officers?  Source:  F. C. Fuller, A Military History of the Western World, Da Capo Press, 1987, ISBN 978-0-306-80305-5 p. 212–215
 * ALT1:... that after the Battle of Leuthen, the victorious Frederick the Great entered the castle in Lissa, and found it already occupied by Austrian officers? Source: F. C. Fuller, A Military History of the Western World, Da Capo Press, 1987, ISBN 978-0-306-80305-5 p. 212–215.

Improved to Good Article status by Auntieruth55 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Article promoted to Good article on 3 April and DYK nominated on the same day. So fits the date range. The nominator has 5 Days so QPQ is required and not done yet. Original hook looks weird to me for some reason so I prefer ALT1. The source for the hook is from the offline book so assuming good faith as the article was GA passed recently. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 15:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * added link to pages. :)  I wasn't sure I was supposed to do that.  I like Alt1 better too.auntieruth (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Review Symbol delete vote.svg   "Articles that have featured (bold link) previously on DYK, or in a blurb on the main page's In the news, or On this day sections are ineligible. (Articles linked at ITN or OTD not in bold, including the recent deaths section, are still eligible.)"
 * Earwig is clear. No close paraphrasing or copy vios.
 * Sorry to chime in. But this looks DOA to me.  So you can do WP:QPQs and worry about timing, etc., but this is all 'rearranging the deck chairs on the Titantic.'
 * FWIW, it is a really worthy article. But the rules are (IMO) clear.  Not eligible.  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 17:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)