Template:Did you know nominations/Bears Ears National Monument


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Bears Ears National Monument

 * ... that the newly proclaimed Bears Ears National Monument in southeastern Utah protects 100,000 archaeological sites, including Ancestral Puebloan cliff dwellings more than 3,500 years old? Source: The area contains an estimated 100,000 archaeological sites, including ancient Pueblo cliff dwellings that are more than 3,500 years old.
 * ALT1:... that the new Bears Ears National Monument in southeastern Utah will become the first national monument to be co-managed by five Native American tribes which hold the mountains and surrounding land to be sacred? Source: The Navajo Nation is one of five tribes that will get an elected official on a first-of-its-kind tribal commission for the Bears Ears monument. The panel will provide federal land managers with tribal expertise and historical knowledge about the area, federal officials said.
 * Created by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk), Chstdu, ProfessorTofty, and Neutralitytalk. Nominated by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) at 00:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC).

Looks almost good to go! Article created on December 29 and nominated a day later. Article looks good, properly sourced throughout. Nominator has no previous DYK credits. No copyvios detected, all false positives due to quotes and names. Alt1 looks good to go, and the source confirms the fact. Alt2 is almost there, but I am unsure if the tribal commission as described in the source is the same as "co-managing" the national monument, as claimed in the hook. Perhaps Alt2 needs to be re-worded?

However, I will fully support this nomination if Alt-1 is chosen. --haha169 (talk) 08:44, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I would like to rephrase my earlier review as it seems I have confused the alt versions. In summary: Symbol confirmed.svgOriginal; Symbol question.svgALT 1  --haha169 (talk) 09:23, 10 January 2017 (UTC)