Template:Did you know nominations/Beatrijs (Dutch magazine)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Beatrijs (Dutch magazine)

 * ... that the Dutch women's magazine Beatrijs for Catholic readers made its photos and patterns more modest by adding collars to low necklines and lengthening skirts?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Templeton Thompson.
 * Comment: See the article for the "more modest"--I can't, in a DYK hook, make the longer point that these were the same patterns and photos used by another publication from the same publisher.

Created by Drmies (talk). Self nominated at 14:57, 2 June 2014 (UTC).


 * Note: the QPQ submitted for this nomination was incomplete. Yoninah (talk) 16:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) QPQ looks great! Yoninah (talk) 23:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol question.svg enough (2 June), long enough (1900+ characters), within policy. Article is based on a number of Dutch language sources (and no English ones), so close paraphrasing is not anticipated to be an issue. Hook is interesting but should be cited in the article with an inline citation after the fact. QPQ accepted, so just one issue to deal with here. C679 05:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure; done. BTW, I think this rule is silly; it's the same reference cited before and after. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 14:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol voting keep.svg Agreed, but rules are rules! Concerns have been adequately addressed. AGF on non-English language sources. C679 18:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Ha, new DYK rule: you must learn the language of any article cited in a DYK. And I'm talking twelve credit hours--not just 101 and 102. Booyah!, please codify that. Drmies (talk) 01:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)