Template:Did you know nominations/Beelzebub's tube-nosed bat, Ashy-gray tube-nosed bat, Walston's tube-nosed bat

Beelzebub's tube-nosed bat, Ashy-gray tube-nosed bat, Walston's tube-nosed bat

 * ... that three new species of tube-nosed bats from Southeast Asia were identified in 2011: the Beelzebub's, Ashy-gray (pictured), and Walston's?
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Tompkins Corners United Methodist Church, Template:Did you know nominations/Constitutional history of Tokelau, Template:Did you know nominations/Chachi people

Created by PumpkinSky (talk). Self nominated at 00:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Very small nitpicks (although overall the articles look quite good): you seem to be confusing the work= and publisher= parameters; i.e. Wired is a work, not a publisher. Also, what makes Monga Bay and Wildlife Extra News reliable? Species are inherently notable, so citing to the original journal article should be fine. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:47, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Fixed Wired, and cut the two refs, to make life simple for us all hehe. OTRS now processed on all photos too. Pumpkin Sky  talk  01:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg That was just an example, there are a couple others (National Geographic, Telegraph, Live Science) which need to be in the "work" parameter. However, that's not a DYK criteria so this should be good to go (although it would be nice to clean that up) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Just cleaned it up. Pumpkin Sky   talk  01:27, 2 July 2013 (UTC)