Template:Did you know nominations/Bella Bond murder case


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 14:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Bella Bond murder case
Improved to Good Article status by Gourami Watcher (talk). Self-nominated at 17:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC).
 * ... that a forensic facial reconstruction of Bella Bond triggered an unexpected amount of publicity?
 * Comment:QPQ on Template:Did you know nominations/Shrek on the Internet


 * Symbol question.svg GA icon awarded on February 4. New enough, long enough, well referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done (though awaiting your final approval). However, I feel the hooks could be strengthened. It would be nice to identify her as a two-year-old; otherwise, she sounds like another missing woman. In the first hook, it would be hookier to say just how many views it got (56 million!). In ALT1, how did you come up with 83 days? An online calculator that I consulted said it was 85 days. I don't think this hook is as strong as the first. Yoninah (talk) 20:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Just revamped the hooks - the version on the time duration must have been an error.
 * ALT2: ... that a forensic facial reconstruction of two-year-old Bella Bond triggered approximately 56 million views?
 * ALT3:... that Bella Bond remained unidentified for 85 days after her body was found?
 *  Gourami Watcher  Talk 23:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Thanks. Both hooks verified and cited inline. I prefer ALT2, and have added a link. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 09:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I agree that the new version of ALT2 seems more interesting. Thanks for your review!-- Gourami Watcher  Talk 17:25, 15 February 2016 (UTC)