Template:Did you know nominations/Biodiversity of Wales

Biodiversity of Wales

 * ... that the biodiversity of Wales has unique species which can only be found in a certain region in Wales and nowhere else in the world?
 * Comment: Created in my userspace on 24 September 2012 and moved to article space on 28 September 2012

Created/expanded by RexRowan (talk). Self nom at 10:22, 30 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg Article has numerous citation needed tags, and the hook is over 200 characters. Sasata (talk) 08:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The hook has been trimmed. The article is well referenced. The citation needed tags are added by good faith editing that has no real need, thanks. -- RexRowan 忍( Ninja signal ) 12:29, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Reexamined article, still needing citations. RexRowan please note Did you know/Supplementary guidelines supplementary rule D2 is all paragraphs (no matter the length) should in general have citations. Currently the "Evolution" and "Human Impact/woodlands" are both basically unsourced.  Also note D6 which states articles with dispute tags (such as citation needed templates) are likely to be rejected.-- Kev  min  § 02:22, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, added the tags, does it look ok now? -- RexRowan Talk  10:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Much of the language and paragraph structure of "Evolution" is far too close to that of the single source used in that section. Please see WP:Close paraphrasing; still needs quite a bit of work to distance the prose from the source. A greater variety of sources would help too. Sasata (talk) 01:43, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Much of the language and paragraph structure of "Evolution" is far too close to that of the single source used in that section. Please see WP:Close paraphrasing; still needs quite a bit of work to distance the prose from the source. A greater variety of sources would help too. Sasata (talk) 01:43, 9 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Symbol delete vote.svg Sadly no changes have been made to the noted possible copyvio in the evolution section.-- Kev min  § 22:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't mean to leave it like that, I have tried my best to reorder the content but due its highly scientific nature, I do not want to shorten it or reword it to a higher degree in case I misrepresent the data. An expert from the field is welcomed to have a try. Many thanks! -- RexRowan Talk  09:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)