Template:Did you know nominations/Black cowboys


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Black cowboys

 * ... that from the 1860s to 1880s, nearly 25% of cowboys in the American West were black? Source: Porter, Kenneth (1994). "African Americans in the Cattle Industry, 1860s-1880s". Peoples of color in the American West ([Nachdr.] ed.). Lexington, Mass. [u.a.]: Heath. pp. 158–167. ISBN 0669279137, and again in Deadwood Dick and the Black Cowboys, The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education (22): 30. 1998. doi:10.2307/2998819. Retrieved 29 August 2017.
 * ALT1:... that there were once up to 9,000 black cowboys in the American West? Source: "Same as main hook, just rephrasing.
 * ALT2:... that nearly 25% of cowboys in the American West were black?
 * Reviewed: DYK for Una B. Herrick.

Created by Owlsmcgee (talk). Self-nominated at 21:04, 3 September 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Interesting article . New, in time, long enough, sourced, no apparent copyvios, neutral. I much prefer ALT0, which gives perspective. 9,000 can be a lot or a little, and ALT1 does not indicate which. JSTOR article says 8,000 cowboys, however, not 9,000. Also needs QPQ. --Usernameunique (talk) 23:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks you ! I've done my QPQ review here, and added an ALT2. Feel free to strike ALT1.Owlsmcgee (talk) 21:42, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Looks good! I prefer ALT0, as it contextualized the time frame. --Usernameunique (talk) 21:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)