Template:Did you know nominations/Bridges over the Brisbane River


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 14:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Insufficient recent expansion

Bridges over the Brisbane River

 * ... that the Brisbane suburbs of Chelmer and Indooroopilly are connected by four separate bridges over the Brisbane River?


 * ALT1:... that the suburb of South Brisbane is connected to the Brisbane CBD by seven separate bridges over the Brisbane River?

5x expanded by Neegzistuoja (talk). Self-nominated at 03:23, 4 October 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol delete vote.svg Unfortunately, this article does not qualify for DYK. It was nominated eight days after its most recent edit, but the edit was to add a new column to an existing table. DYK's expansions are increases to the amount of prose characters in the article, and tables do not count as prose. (The amount expanded, even if the characters had been prose, was very far from 5x.) So, basically, the article remains the same size (over 3,000 prose characters), and would have to increase to over 15,000 prose characters. As such an increase is simply not feasible, I'm marking the nomination for closure. I hope you'll try again. Please remember that new articles must be nominated within seven days of creation (or after being moved from Draft or User space to mainspace) and must be at least 1,500 prose characters, and expanded articles must be nominated within seven days of when you started the expansion, and that the expanded article must be at least five times the length of the article before the expansion began. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC)