Template:Did you know nominations/Buttermilk Creek (Susquehanna River)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by sst✈ 08:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Buttermilk Creek (Susquehanna River)

 * ... that the waterfalls on Buttermilk Creek have been called "the most outstanding example of this kind of waterfall system in Pennsylvania"?


 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Onion powder

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 13:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg You might need more citations in the intro paragraphs. There is nothing after the second sentence for citations. A photo would be really nice if possible.

long enough and new enough, interesting hook — Preceding unsigned comment added by Courtney.cleveland (talk • contribs) 23:15, 26 September 2015‎ (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Given the many issues with the above review: it was unsigned and nearly commented out, there were caveats expressed, and the policy criteria were not addressed at all, I think it is important that another reviewer give this nomination a complete check. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg I don't really understand the initial comment as ledes do not typically contain citations but instead are summaries of text in the body, so am starting this from scratch. Nom on 18 Sept and moved to article space on the 11th so within 7 day window, 7597 char - long enough, appears neutral, no apparent copy-vios, hook is 137 char thus within maximum, QPQ done. No image. Inline citations exist throughout the article, however, the hook statement itself is not cited. I attempted to access the next citation, but is an off-line source. DYK requires that the hook have its own citation, thus please correct. If the cite is for the Water Resources Inventory Report must be AGF approval. SusunW (talk) 16:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I've copied the citation, since for some bizarre reason that appears to be a DYK rule. It isn't offline as far as I'm aware though (but it is a large PDF). --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec  00:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg I can access it fine. Thanks :) citation verifies hook. GTG, . SusunW (talk) 00:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)