Template:Did you know nominations/CGR 1st Class 2-6-0 1891

CGR 1st Class 2-6-0 1891

 * ... that the CGR 1st Class 2-6-0 1891 (pictured) were the first American locomotives to enter service in South Africa?
 * Comment: Not a self nomination
 * Comment: Not a self nomination

Created by Andre Kritzinger (talk). Nominated by Matty.007 (talk) at 16:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg QPQ missing. To nominator: please review another article before we go any further. Thanks, Poeticbent  talk  05:37, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, QPQ is not needed for non self nominations. I asked Crisco here. Thanks, Mat  ty  .  007  09:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright, let's rehash this thing again. Review requirement #5 (quote): "New nominators (those with fewer than five DYK credits) are exempt from this review requirement..." But you are not a "new nominator" User:Matty.007. Don't place the QPQ burden on the creator who probably didn't ask for your nom to start with. "Your nomination" (i.e. the nomination) of another editor's article is not exempt, because you have more than 5 credits.  Poeticbent  talk  10:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * It also says "Reviewing another editor's nomination is part of the nomination process for self-nominations", and "New nominators (those with fewer than five DYK credits) are exempt from this review requirement, as is the nomination of another editor's article" seem to be saying that nominations of other editors work do not require QPQ. Mat  ty  .  007  11:18, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * And in response to "Don't place the QPQ burden on the creator who probably didn't ask for your nom to start with", I asked the page creator on his talk page; in this edit, and he replied that "It will be considered a compliment!", which seems to be endorsing the nomination whole-heartedly.  Mat  ty  .  007  11:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed; QPQ is *not* required. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol voting keep.svg This article is new enough and long enough and is ready to steam off. The image is in the public domain and the hook is sourced. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. Mat  ty  .  007  18:00, 15 November 2013 (UTC)