Template:Did you know nominations/Can't Stop the Love (Neon Jungle song)


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:21, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Can't Stop the Love (Neon Jungle song)

 * ... that Neon Jungle's "Can't Stop the Love" invited participation from fans?
 * Comment: At the time of writing, WP:REFLINKS was reporting a 504 Gateway Time Out. I will see this message when I come back to this nomination - don't bother reminding me.
 * Comment: At the time of writing, WP:REFLINKS was reporting a 504 Gateway Time Out. I will see this message when I come back to this nomination - don't bother reminding me.

Created by Launchballer (talk). Self nominated at 20:31, 9 November 2014 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg This article is new enough and long enough. It is neutral and I didn't detect any close paraphrasing. I don't think the hook is satisfactory however (the song can't issue an invitation). I suggest ALT1
 * ALT1 ... that fans were invited to take part in the video for Neon Jungle's new single, "Can't Stop the Love"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwmhiraeth (talk • contribs) 20:22, 19 November 2014‎ (UTC)
 * What is going on with reviewers not bothering to sign their reviews and, more importantly, why isn't intervening? Obviously, you can't accept your own hook so consider this one:
 * ALT2 ... that for the music video for Can't Stop the Love, Neon Jungle invited participation from their fans?-- Laun  chba  ller  12:19, 6 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Review needs to be completed, and ALT hooks considered. Cwmhiraeth, did you want to continue, given that you were the initial reviewer, or should we get someone new? BlueMoonset (talk) 22:32, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Well I think my ALT1 is a lot better than ALT2, so you still need another reviewer. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:11, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment review under way. Earwig report 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 19:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


 * ALT3 ... that Neon Jungle tweeted fans inviting them to be in the video for "Can't Stop the Love"? 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 20:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Partial review. User:Launchballer, Needs a QPQ.  User page indicates this self nominator has 65 DYKs.  I've called this to his attention.  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 20:09, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Review Symbol question.svg Symbol question.svg - Meets all DYK requirements. New article, long enough, timely nominated.  However,  QPQ has not been provided, and this is a self nomination where one is required.  The article meets core policies and guidelines. Every paragraph is now cited.
 * Hook reference is verified and cited.
 * No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing.  Earwig report The quote about the band's feelings about the song could be paraphrased. The critical reception is a mashup of some sketchy quotes from reviews, but I don't think they are excessive.
 * The hooks are hooky enough, I think. They relate directly to the essence of the article, and are interesting, decently neutral, and cited.  All the hooks say the same thing, albeit in a different order.  I think ALT 3 is better (includes "tweat" and is shorter, and it is a middle ground between ALT 1 and ALT 2), but would like input and compromise from the other concerned editors.  We should arrive at an informed consensus.  Meanwhile, this should not be promoted until a WP:QPQ is provided.  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎</b>) 15:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Template:Did_you_know_nominations/CNN_Philippines. I must be honest and say, as someone long enough to have come out with 65 DYK credits, I have never seen one hook tweaked so much.-- Laun  chba  ller  17:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * User:Launchballer Thanks for posting the QPQ. As the nominator, it would be helpful if you could tell us which of the three you prefer. Maybe this would be a tie breaker.  Thanks.  <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 17:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Usually the hooks I like tend to be the ones that are lambasted. However, the quickest way to get this approved would be for you to approve ALT1.-- Laun  chba  ller  21:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Review Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go for all the foregoing reasons. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism.


 * I defer to the creator/nominator of this article, and note that ALT 1 is fully supported by the source. So are ALTs 2 and 3, which are just as good, but I think it is his call absent a compelling reason to vary therefrom.  There being no such reason in the record, I recommend ALT 1.  <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 21:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)