Template:Did you know nominations/Carolyn Shaw Bell


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Carolyn Shaw Bell

 * ... that economics professor Carolyn Shaw Bell established a model that sent a disproportionate number of students at Wellesley College into careers in economics and business? Source: "YET none of these colleges -- nor any other college or university -- has produced proportionately as many corporate women in high positions as Wellesley....Wellesley has Carolyn Bell, who within the school set a model...She obviously influenced enormous numbers of women...She was a fierce promoter of Wellesley economics graduates."
 * ALT1:... that an award named for Carolyn Shaw Bell is given by the American Economic Association to economists who promote the success of women in this profession? Source: "Dr. Bell carried her equality campaign to the American Economic Association, where she was a founder of the group's Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession. In 1998, the committee established the Carolyn Shaw Bell Award for the person who has most advanced women in the profession."
 * Reviewed: I am exempt from QPQ because I have less than 5 DYK credits

Created by EAWH (talk). Self-nominated at 19:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC).


 * I will perform the DYK review for this article.— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 13:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

, Overall, this looks pretty good, I just have a couple of comments above.— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 15:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

, Thank you very much for your careful review and for your improvements to the article. I think I have incorporated all of your comments.EAWH (talk) 17:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, I made an edit here. If you're good with this - or something similar - it looks like we're good to go.— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 17:59, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

, This is fine with me!EAWH (talk) 18:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC) - Passed Based upon 's feedback, I marked it as passed.— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 18:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC) , I have added additional text to the body of the article to fix this problem.EAWH (talk) 03:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Removed from queue: Neither hook claim is explicitly mentioned in the body of the article. Harrias  talk 21:36, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Thank you, restoring tick per CaroleHenson's review. Harrias  talk 08:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)