Template:Did you know nominations/Celia Brackenridge


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:27, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Celia Brackenridge

 * ... that funding for Celia Brackenridge's research into child protection in football was ended because the sport "was not ready for a gay former lacrosse international rummaging through its dirty linen"? Source:
 * Reviewed: Bapulal Nayak

Created by Cordless Larry (talk). Self-nominated at 18:50, 18 June 2018 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Created 17 June, nom 18th-new enough. 2176 char-long enough. Neutral, cited. QPQ done. Hook at 199 char is just under the maximum, verified to the source and cited within the article. No image. There appears to be some close paraphrasing to the Guardian article. Please c/e and ping me when completed. SusunW (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that - I used that source to sketch out the structure of the first draft and so the article became a bit dependent on it. I've tried to paraphrase a bit more thoroughly and have brought in more information from the Independent article too. Are you happy with the current version, ? Cordless Larry (talk) 06:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg A review of Earwig shows unlikely violation and scrutiny of the hits confirms that the higher numbers are now due mainly to titles and quotations. GTG SusunW (talk) 14:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)