Template:Did you know nominations/Cestoda


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:10, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Cestoda

 * ... that around 1900, tapeworm eggs were marketed to the public as slimming aids?
 * Reviewed: Brugada syndrome

Improved to Good Article status by Chiswick Chap (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). Nominated by Cwmhiraeth (talk) at 08:43, 25 July 2018 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg This is a newly promoted GA, and is long enough and nominated soon enough but I would dispute the hook. Please see: . Also, with regard to your cited source as one reviewer points out "... the number of en passant errors and omissions ... undermines the authority that such an idiosyncratic book relies on." Tapeworms are still interesting so I hope you can come up with another hook. Edit-pi (talk) 21:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Non-free content may only used in the article namespace per WP:NFCC which means File:Fat banished tapeworm ad 1900.jpg cannot be displayed on this page. I've hidden the image syntax in the DYK template at the top of the page. If an image is needed for this nomination, please use a public domain or freely-licensed image instead. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, there is some doubt as to the accuracy of the original hook, so I will suggest ALT1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ALT1 ... that tapeworms inhabit the guts of vertebrates but have no guts of their own?
 * Symbol question.svg:DYKDN "The hook fact must have an inline citation right after it ... citing the hook fact at the end of the paragraph is not acceptable." Please indicate the citations for the two parts of the hook (inhabit vertebrate guts & no gut of its own).
 * Symbol question.svg also notice that the Tapeworm->Cestoda redirect might soon be retargeted to Tapeworm->Eucestoda, shouldn't we wait until that discussion is resolved? Edit-pi (talk) 09:27, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The hook facts should be covered by the following two sentences. I have changed the punctuation in the second one to provide the inline citation. "All 6000 species of Cestoda are intestinal parasites; their definitive hosts are vertebrates, both terrestrial and marine, while their intermediate hosts include insects, crustaceans, molluscs, and annelids as well as other vertebrates.[2]" and "The animal has no gut and absorbs nutrients from the host's alimentary tract through its neodermis, or cuticle; gas exchange takes place through the neodermis,[1]"
 * I don't think the renaming proposal is relevant to this nomination which is made in connection with the article Cestoda becoming a GA. I don't really want to waste time on this point which I can see might end up a timesink. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2018 (UTC)


 * ALT2 ... that adult tapeworms parasitise the intestines of vertebrates but have no gut of their own?


 * Thanks. ALT2 is fine and I have struck ALT1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:28, 27 July 2018 (UTC)