Template:Did you know nominations/Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome

Length/age

Child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome
Created/expanded by 1StrangerSC (talk), ProBonoPublicoA90 (talk), Lena xo (talk). Nominated by 1StrangerSC (talk) at 19:09, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * ... that surveys conducted estimate 10% of all females have been a victim of child sexual abuse, and almost 2% by their own father?


 * Symbol delete vote.svg Article is only 850 characters. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote4.png The size of it has been topsy turvy since the nomination.  Here's why:
 * August 1 - day of nomination, it was a 5X expansion with 29,251 characters of readable prose
 * August 3 - Tagged for NPOV, and sysop Arthur Rubin deleted most of the article, explained on the Talk Page, leaving it with 863 characters of readable prose
 * August 10 - ProBonoPublicoA90 added expansion, taking it back up to a 5X expansion with 17,748 readable prose
 * It has issues with sourcing, as most paragraphs are not sourced. But, hopefully, ProBonoPublicoA90 will add sourcing to those paragraphs, and communicate here.  And, hopefully, this can go through the whole DYK process and/or all concerned on this can communicate on this template, so the DYK process isn't left hanging.
 * Maile66 (talk) 23:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Well, right now we have sourcing issues, we have non-neutral, essay-like prose... — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your feedback, I will work on this and get back to you very soon. I really appreciate your help.
 * ProBonoPublicoA90 (talk)
 * There are a number of articles available online. These are the first three that I found: here, here, and here. It seems that it could be a great article with all the available information. Anne (talk) 13:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol delete vote.svg Eight days after the last edit, the article has not been expanded a single bit and continues with 863 characters of readable prose. I think this should just be failed. --Diego Grez (talk) 19:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)