Template:Did you know nominations/Cho Ki-chon


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Cho Ki-chon

 * ... that North Korean poet Cho Ki-chon offered some of the earliest contributions to North Korea's cult of personality?


 * Comment: Promoted to GA status on June 29 (6 days ago). I have less than 5 DYK nominations.
 * Comment: Promoted to GA status on June 29 (6 days ago). I have less than 5 DYK nominations.

Improved to Good Article status by Finnusertop (talk). Self-nominated at 19:53, 5 July 2016 (UTC).


 * Symbol voting keep.svg A new GA nominated in a timely fashion with an interesting hook (cited to an offline source). This is your fifth DYK so QPQ is not needed, though if you nominate another article, it will be. You should be very proud of this article - it is quite interesting! Raymie (t • c) 02:36, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg This is a great GA nominated promptly that sports an interesting hook which is cited to an offline source to which I give GF. A QPQ is not needed. All other criteria are met and the nominator should be haughtily imperious of this article - it is very fascinating! (per a decision in ANI, this nom requires two reviews) LavaBaron (talk) 16:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, and . It's an interesting topic indeed - there are actually some related, notable bios that still lack articles - I might go for a Good Topic sometime in the future. Just one more thing: while you can probably find the source in print as well, I'm citing an online version. Note how the ref has a doi associated with it. Dois uniquely identify online resources and serve as persistent links. This is good news for verifiability, of course. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm glad to see you used DOIs. That's a good best practice in citations and I wish more Wikipedia articles used them where possible. Raymie (t • c) 23:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)