Template:Did you know nominations/Circuit split


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Circuit split

 * ... that scholars suggest the Supreme Court of the United States is more likely to grant review of a case to resolve a circuit split than for any other reason?


 * ALT1:... that circuit splits may lead to economic inefficiency?

5x expanded by Notecardforfree (talk). Self-nominated at 19:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol voting keep.svg New enough (5x expanded on June 27 from a surprisingly tiny stub), long enough, no copyvio or close paraphrasing. AGF hooks sourced to print sources (but easily confirmed elsewhere online). QPQ not needed. I prefer the first hook for being more specific and for making clear that this is a US topic. Good to go. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:09, 14 July 2015 (UTC)