Template:Did you know nominations/Cognitive specialization


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fuebaey (talk) 17:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Cognitive specialization

 * ... that there are specialized mechanisms in the human brain for trust, language, and putting ourselves "in another person's shoes"?
 * Comment: Original nomination had two capitalized letters; fixed that so this is the actual article. Expanded from a stub; was posted on "Wiki project in Psychology: Articles that need attention" page.
 *  Reviewed:  The Honest Company
 *  Reviewed:  The Honest Company

5x expanded by Mbhargis (talk). Self nominated at 23:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC).


 * The article started expanding on 12 November 2014. Six days later, 18 November, it was nominated. Don't worry; it was on time and within seven-day limit. So the nomination is safe. I just moved it to 13th (which I was mistaken)... and then 12th. --George Ho (talk) 07:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you, George! -- User:mbhargis


 * Any update on this? Mbhargis (talk) 01:31, 14 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:44, 16 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Symbol voting keep.svg - Unable to read sources - AGF
 * New – As above; started expansion on 12th Nov and was nominated on the 18th Nov.
 * Long enough – the article is long enough.
 * Within policy – the article is neutral, has inline citations throughout the article and I cannot find any evidence of copyright violations.
 * Hook - It is fewer than 200 characters, it is interesting and it is cited within the article (though I don't have access to the full sources)
 * QPQ - Done.
 * Very interesting read and lots of citations - Good job! ツStacey (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)