Template:Did you know nominations/Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. Fung

Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. Fung

 * ... that in Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. Fung, the defendant's "red flag knowledge" caused the court to determine that the defendant was ineligible for DMCA safe harbor provisions?

Comment

Created by Ashwin.d.chandak (talk). Nominated by Riyazdf (talk) at 01:11, 2 November 2013 (UTC).




 * Symbol delete vote.svg Heavily unreferenced. ☯ Bonkers The Clown  \(^_^)/  Nonsensical Babble  ☯ 08:59, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: I have just notified the nominator's talk page, which hadn't yet been done. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the notification -- I've edited the lead section of the article to include the DYK (it checks out from the reference of the court case), and added references to the relevant cases after paragraphs. Riyazdf (talk) 06:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol possible vote.svg Significant improvement in referencing, although many are bare URLs, which are not allowed for DYKs. I've added some "citation needed" templates; these need inline sources as well. Once this is taken care of, I can call for a full review. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2013 (UTC)


 * References have been properly formatted, and all citations have been given. Riyazdf (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg This article is now ready for DYK. It is new enough and long enough and sufficiently and appropriately referenced. The hook fact is well cited. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:41, 27 November 2013 (UTC)