Template:Did you know nominations/Conflict (process)

Conflict (process)

 * ... that some conflicts may be beneficial?
 * Reviewed: Narendra Modi's Google+ Hangout
 * Comment: If anyone can think of a more interesting hook, feel free to suggest it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 18:09, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Created/expanded by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 18:09, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: I am new to DYK, so a second opinion is required before full review is accepted. CathMontgomery (talk) 10:55, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: The DYK text is valid and is in article. CathMontgomery (talk) 10:55, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have also added to the article that conflict is beneficial to avoid the error of "Group think". CathMontgomery (talk) 10:55, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg Comment: I have seen lots of debate about redlink names in articles. Proposed compromise: The 2 redlink BLP names in such a recent article would be better not redlinked while on the main-page for DYK,   then can be redlinked again afterwards.  I can do this maintenance before and after if anyone agrees with me.  Let me know, Thanks.  CathMontgomery (talk) 10:55, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know what debate you mention, but the last time I checked, WP:RED was still a policy and recommends having redlinks everywhere. Front page is an exception, but as long as have no red links in the hook, that's fine. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 15:48, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Piotr is correct. Redlinks are recommended. There's nothing wrong with them whatsoever. Manxruler (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote4.png Needs a new, complete review. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Well-referenced, but the lead should define the fields covered more clearly. Some overlap with Social conflict; ultimately a merge, or transfer of some of that here might be better. Johnbod (talk) 12:55, 30 October 2012 (UTC)