Template:Did you know nominations/Cordón del Azufre


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 02:32, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Cordón del Azufre

 * ... that Cordón del Azufre is part of one of the largest deforming volcanic systems on Earth, comparable with Yellowstone?


 * Reviewed: Vera Songwe
 * Comment: Need a bit of inspiration with the hook.

5x expanded by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 20:08, 23 February 2016 (UTC).


 * The article has been expanded on Feb 23, from 321 to 4803 chars of prose - so new enough, long enough, expanded more than 10x. I think the hook is fine really (apart from being well-formed), but I'll try to think of an ALT if possible.
 * No cleanup tags, no obvious problems, inline referencing throughout, and the sources themselves are fine, however...
 * Symbol question.svg 1) The "comparable with Yellowstone" sentence should be inline-referenced, since the hook is partly based on it, and 2) the article seems long enough to have intro and sections - I don't think that's a DYK requirement, strictly speaking, and I know that there are no obvious sections in it, but I'd really recommend it. Will continue the review later. GregorB (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Inline citation is added. As for headers, I wonder if having a "Geographic context" and "Ground deformation" header is the way to split if we want to go with this.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:22, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That seems right to me. GregorB (talk) 21:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg Okay: the hook appears in the text and is now fully supported by inline refs. (Yellowstone comparison is offline, so AGF on that.) Could not find any close paraphrasing. QPQ done. Sections are fine, the intro is not strictly by the book but I don't think that's a problem. I've tweaked the hook in order to bypass redirect. Good to go then. GregorB (talk) 19:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)