Template:Did you know nominations/Corruption in Bolivia


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ  -DK 21:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Corruption in Bolivia

 * ... that a survey in Bolivia reported that one in three respondents had paid bribes to customs officials the previous year?
 * ALT1: ... that the past six years in Bolivia have witnessed three police chiefs fired for corruption or abuse of power?
 * ALT2: ... that Bolivia's narcotics police have been involved with trafficking cocaine since the 1950's?
 * ALT3: ... that the Bolivian government did not investigate the 2012 murder of two journalists?
 * ALT4: ... that in 2015 a Bolivian minister and ambassador were implicated in a scandal wherein almost $10 million of a foundation's budget was unaccounted for?


 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Phalat

Created by DaltonCastle (talk). Self-nominated at 01:45, 18 August 2016 (UTC).

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:34, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * &#x2713; This article is new and was created on 21:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * &#x2713; This article meets the DYK criteria at 21876 characters
 * &#x2713; All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
 * &#x2713; This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
 * &#x2713; A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (18.7% confidence; confirm)
 * Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 107 characters
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 105 characters
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT2 is an appropriate length at 89 characters
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT3 is an appropriate length at 80 characters
 * &#x2713; The hook ALT4 is an appropriate length at 145 characters
 * &#x2713; DaltonCastle has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Phalat was performed for this nomination.


 * Symbol confirmed.svg This substantial and impressive article is new enough and long enough. I am approving the original hook, which I tweaked, as being interesting and having inline citations. (I was going to also approve ALT1 but then had doubts about the "six years" because the report seems to be dated 2012.) The other hooks may be correct but I have not checked them, and I have struck them merely for clarity. The article seems neutral to me and I did not detect any policy issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)