Template:Did you know nominations/Cream-spotted cardinalfish


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Ozichthys albimaculosus

 * ... that the cream-spotted cardinalfish is the type species of a new genus of tropical ray-finned fish described in 2014?
 * ALT1 ... that the cream-spotted cardinalfish is the type species of a new genus of fish described in 2014?
 * ALT2 ... that Ozichthys albimaculosus is the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish described in 2014?
 * Reviewed: Djibouti at the 2008 Summer Olympics

Created/expanded by Gaff (talk). Self nominated at 21:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC).


 * Began review, new enough, long enough. AshLin (talk) 11:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Info clumped up, seperated it into sections, makes it more readable. ✅.
 * Hook just not interesting enough - there are many monotypic genera. Please suggest alternatives not invoving monotypic genus status.
 * Please use Template:Convert for depth range to show depth both in feet and meters.✅
 * The superfluous words "Ref Ref. 90102" & "TL male/unsexed" shows sloppy cut & paste from Fishbase. Please be careful, it also implies that copyvio/close paraphrasing issues may exist. AshLin (talk) 14:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)✅
 * Yes, besides the two copyvios, there are close paraphrasing issues also - " a single pore above and below the raised median canal on each pored lateral line scale", please rephrase this.✅
 * "color patterns present on the head body and vertical fins and"
 * "apogonichthys foa fowleria and neamia"
 * Please reconcile these & ping me or place a message on my talk page. AshLin (talk) 14:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. Copyvio/close paraphrasing concerns have (hopefully) been adequately addressed.   Sadly, your concerns about the hook not being of interest may prove insurmountable, in which case, I'll abandon this as a candidate.  To a lay reader such as myself (physician by trade), a new genus of fish being described this year (2 months ago) seems interesting enough. (At least as, if not more, interesting than 2 out of 5 DYK noms.)  But, I'm happy to work with you... How about these?  One emphasizes the timeliness of the entry, another notes some interesting features of the fish, and one does both:
 * ALT3 ... that this summer the cream-spotted cardinalfish was announced to be the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish?
 * ALT4 ... that the cream-spotted cardinalfish is a nocturnal mouthbrooder, was announced this summer to be the sole member of a new genus?
 * ALT5 ... that this summer a nocturnal mouthbrooder, the cream-spotted cardinalfish, was found to be the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish? &mdash; Gaff  ταλκ  21:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

I recommend a mish-mash of of the above, composed from two seperate sentences in the text & duly referenced inline.
 * ALT6 ... that the cream-spotted cardinalfish, the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish, Ozichthys, described in 2014, is a nocturnal mouthbrooder? ✅

Good to go AshLin (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)