Template:Did you know nominations/Cullerlie stone circle


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Cullerlie stone circle

 * ... that Cullerlie stone circle (pictured) in Aberdeenshire has a unique layout, with eight stones surrounding eight small cairns?


 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Lady Kane

Created by Prioryman (talk). Self-nominated at 06:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Article is new enough and long enough. Image has a free licence and is good quality. Article is well referenced. Hook is correctly formatted. I am getting an error on the Aberdeen link and all of the Google books links. Are the links to page previews or just to the general Google Books page? Philafrenzy (talk) 22:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Google Books seems to be down at the moment - people are complaining about it on Twitter. The Aberdeen website seems to have partially gone down as well, though the referenced page is still viewable in the Google cache. Prioryman (talk) 06:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Apparently the solution is to change .com to .co.uk or .ca or .fr which makes the page viewable. I hope .com will be restored soon or an awful lot of links on Wikipedia are going to be dead. I will continue your review when I have a moment. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:57, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Just a reminder that this review is still outstanding... Prioryman (talk) 20:48, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I see Google Books is back. I will finish it shortly. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg I am AGFing some of the more technical archaeological material. AGF on offline refs 4 & 5. I detected no close paraphrasing or copy vios. Good to go. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)