Template:Did you know nominations/David Zowie


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Keilana&#124;Parlez ici 05:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

David Zowie, House Every Weekend

 * ... that David Zowie is set to top the UK Singles Chart on Friday?


 * Comment: Although this looks uninteresting, lots of people on Google are complaining that they were confusing him with David Bowie, who is de facto retired. In addition, the date the chart is released has been moved two days earlier.
 * Comment: Although this looks uninteresting, lots of people on Google are complaining that they were confusing him with David Bowie, who is de facto retired. In addition, the date the chart is released has been moved two days earlier.

Created by Launchballer (talk). Self-nominated at 19:41, 8 July 2015 (UTC).


 * ALT1: ... that David Zowie "House Every Weekend" was the UK Singles Chart's first Friday number one? -- Laun  chba  ller  00:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg A QPQ is needed for this nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:59, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Make that two QPQs. I struck the first hook, which appears to be outdated, and doesn't mention the nomination's second article. M AN d ARAX  •  XAЯA b ИA M  23:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The article on House Every Weekend was written well after the article on Zowie was nominated; an IP wrote an article, but left five empty sections which I filled with content in David Zowie. ✅.-- Laun  chba  ller  00:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed now that QPQs have been submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol confirmed.svg These two articles qualify for DYK on the basis of newness and length. The hook is well cited, the articles are neutral and I found no evidence of close paraphrasing. BlueMoonset states that the necessary QPQs have been done, so this is ready to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)