Template:Did you know nominations/Depression Quest


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 13:52, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Depression Quest

 * ... that developer Zoe Quinn considered delaying the release of Depression Quest due to the death of Robin Williams?

Created by Mr. Stradivarius (talk), Euchrid (talk), Swim Jonse (talk) and Deathawk (talk). Nominated by Mr. Stradivarius (talk) at 15:31, 25 August 2014 (UTC).


 * Note: I haven't reviewed any other nominations yet - I'll get round to that tomorrow. Also, I'm wondering whether the hook might be a little insensitive? I'll try to think of some alternatives, but if anyone thinks of a good one before me, feel free. :) — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 15:41, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The review is now complete: Template:Did you know nominations/Crawl (video game). — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 13:42, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg New (19th), long enough, neutral (which is tricky in this case), some close paraphrasing found via spot check (try testing the other sources with dup detector to the right of this review before proceeding), QPQ done. Hook doesn't have an immediate ref in article (see 3b), though it checks out. I don't think it is insensitive as phrased. Usually the gameplay section goes before the development. One missing citation needs to be resolved. SegmentNext does not appear to be a reliable source. Please ping me if I don't respond. czar ♔   00:26, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! I've added a ref for the hook at the immediate end of the sentence, fixed the section order, removed the uncited sentence, and removed the sentence that was sourced to SegmentNext. I've also fixed one sentence that had wording that was, in retrospect, too close to the source. I've checked with the dupe detector and nothing else looks like close paraphrasing - were there any other sentences you were worried about? — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 03:40, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Looks good czar ♔   04:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)