Template:Did you know nominations/Diamond Research and Mercantile City


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 10:43, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Diamond Research and Mercantile City

 * ... that the Diamond Research and Mercantile City will house India's second Diamond Exchange?
 * Reviewed: Kamal Ranadive
 * Comment: Looking for more hooks to add if these seems boring

Created by Rsrikanth05 (talk). Self nominated at 17:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC).


 * ALT1: ... that the Diamond Research and Mercantile City based in Gujarat will house the proposed second Diamond Bourse of India? —  Nearly Headless Nick   {c}  19:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with ALT1 as well. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:22, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Didn't quite get the point of your message. There was no incomplete review earlier that you have stated a Full review is required. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:06, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Rsrikanth05, the point is to note that the prior discussion doesn't change the fact that a review is needed. A number of reviewers will see text here, even an ALT hook and reply, and skim right by it, assuming that a review is under way. Since no one had stopped by here for three weeks, it seemed wise to put up the red icon to note that a complete review was still needed; I do this on many reviews that appear stalled. I'll do so again immediately below so they don't think that this discussion is part of a review; please don't reply unless you want to further delay matters. Thanks.


 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol question.svg New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. However, the hook is a little boring, more factual than hooky. How about doing something with the DREAM City acronym?
 * ALT2: ... that diamonds and textiles will be part of the mix at DREAM City in Surat, India?
 * ALT3: ... that DREAM City will be Gujarat's third smart city? Yoninah (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Using DREAM city instead of the full form seems fine, but in ALT2, it says Diamonds and Textile, when actually the entire city will be dedicated to diamond manufacturing and textiles just form a small part as a university. Also, Dream City is the third smart city in Gujarat, and the first in Surat. I guess something can be done along this. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * So please suggest something, so I can approve it. I made the correction about Gujarat's third smart city in the hook and article. Yoninah (talk) 21:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

ALT3 sounds perfect. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Thanks. But since I suggested it, I can't approve it. Could another reviewer please sign off on ALT3? Yoninah (talk) 22:20, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg ALT3 is properly referenced and good to go. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 10:02, 9 April 2015 (UTC)